top of page
Search

Edexcel GCSE Modern Languages Results 2026

Edexcel GCSE Modern Languages Results 2026

German / French / Spanish


2025–2026 comparison and planning for 2027

 

Important: 2026 is not simply another year of the same Edexcel GCSE. German, French and Spanish moved onto new specifications for first assessment in 2026. The new qualifications are marked out of 200 rather than 280, and the subject codes changed from 1GN0/1FR0/1SP0 to 1GN1/1FR1/1SP1. This means 2025 raw-mark boundaries should not be presented as a straight year-on-year measure of difficulty.


Executive summary

  • The 2026 Edexcel MFL results need to be read as the first awarding year of a new assessment model, not as a routine continuation of the 2025 qualification.

  • At Foundation, German, French and Spanish have exactly the same 2026 subject-level boundaries: 76% for grade 5, 70.5% for grade 4, 50% for grade 3, 30% for grade 2 and 10% for grade 1.

  • At Higher, the three languages are strikingly close. German requires 87.5% for a 9; French 87.5%; Spanish 89.5%. At grade 7 the figures are 73%, 73.5% and 76% respectively.

  • The most important difference between the languages is therefore not the Foundation boundary profile but the slightly higher Spanish Higher profile, particularly at grades 9–6.

  • The 2025 boundaries were based on the previous 280-mark specification. Comparing the percentage profile is more meaningful than comparing raw marks, but even percentage comparisons need caution because the assessment model and specification changed.

  • As of 21 August 2026, Pearson's detailed GCSE examiner reports are not yet available; Pearson states that the GCSE examiner reports are due on 25 August. A genuinely paper-by-paper performance analysis should therefore be updated once those reports are released.

AI image


1. What changed in 2026?

Pearson describes the new German GCSE as first taught from September 2024 and first assessed in 2026. The 2026 German qualification is therefore the first live examination of the new specification. The same first-assessment change applies to the new French and Spanish qualifications.

Table

Language

2025 qualification

2026 qualification

Maximum mark

German

1GN0

1GN1

200

French

1FR0

1FR1

200

Spanish

1SP0

1SP1

200

This is the single most important point for interpreting the data. In 2025 the three established qualifications were marked out of 280. In 2026 the new qualifications are marked out of 200. A statement such as 'German needed 190 marks in 2025 but only 152 in 2026' would be technically true but educationally misleading.


2. 2026 grade boundaries: Foundation

Table

Language

Grade 5

Grade 4

Grade 3

Grade 2

Grade 1

German

152

140

100

60

20

French

152

141

100

60

20

Spanish

152

141

100

60

20


The Foundation profile is unusually uniform. All three languages have identical subject-level boundaries in 2026. That should not be interpreted as evidence that the papers were identical in difficulty; grade boundaries are set after marking and are designed to maintain standards within each qualification.


3. 2026 grade boundaries: Higher

Table

Language

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

German

175

160

146

130

115

100

92

French

175

161

147

133

120

107

100

Spanish

179

165

152

137

122

108

101



Higher boundary profile as percentages

Table

Language

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

German

87.5%

80.0%

73.0%

65.0%

57.5%

50.0%

46.0%

French

87.5%

80.5%

73.5%

66.5%

60.0%

53.5%

50.0%

Spanish

89.5%

82.5%

76.0%

68.5%

61.0%

54.0%

50.5%

Spanish has the highest Higher boundary at every grade from 9 to 3. The gap is small but consistent: for example, grade 9 is 89.5% in Spanish compared with 87.5% in German and French. At grade 4 the difference is 0.5 percentage points versus German and 0.5 versus French. This is better described as a slightly higher boundary profile than as evidence that Spanish is intrinsically 'harder'.


4. 2025 compared with 2026

The table below deliberately gives both raw marks and percentages. The raw marks show what Pearson published; the percentages allow a more sensible visual comparison. However, neither should be used as a simple measure of subject difficulty because the specification changed.


Foundation: 2025 and 2026 boundary profiles

Table

Language

2025 raw

2025 %

2026 raw

2026 %

German

190 / 163 / 122 / 81 / 41

67.9% / 58.2% / 43.6% / 28.9% / 14.6%

152 / 140 / 100 / 60 / 20

76.0% / 70% / 50.0% / 30.0% / 10.0%

French

190 / 171 / 130 / 90 / 50

67.9% / 61.1% / 46.4% / 32.1% / 17.9%

152 / 141 / 100 / 60 / 20

76.0% / 70.5% / 50.0% / 30.0% / 10.0%

Spanish

189 / 166 / 127 / 88 / 50

67.5% / 59.3% / 45.4% / 31.4% / 17.9%

152 / 141 / 100 / 60 / 20

76.0% / 70.5% / 50.0% / 30.0% / 10.0%


Higher: 2025 and 2026 boundary profiles

Table

Language

2025 raw

2025 %

2026 raw

2026 %

German

226 / 199 / 173 / 150 / 127 / 105 / 94

80.7% / 71.1% / 61.8% / 53.6% / 45.4% / 37.5% / 33.6%

175 / 160 / 146 / 130 / 115 / 100 / 92

87.5% / 80.0% / 73.0% / 65.0% / 57.5% / 50.0% / 46.0%

French

226 / 200 / 175 / 153 / 131 / 110 / 99

80.7% / 71.4% / 62.5% / 54.6% / 46.8% / 39.3% / 35.4%

175 / 161 / 147 / 133 / 120 / 107 / 100

87.5% / 80.5% / 73.5% / 66.5% / 60.0% / 53.5% / 50.0%

Spanish

240 / 212 / 185 / 159 / 134 / 109 / 96

85.7% / 75.7% / 66.1% / 56.8% / 47.9% / 38.9% / 34.3%

179 / 165 / 152 / 137 / 122 / 108 / 101

89.5% / 82.5% / 76.0% / 68.5% / 61.0% / 54.0% / 50.5%

5. What the 2026 data actually tells us


German

German is not being given an unusually low 2026 boundary. Its Higher profile is almost identical to French and only slightly below Spanish. The Foundation boundary is identical across all three languages. The more interesting issue for German teachers is therefore not 'German has low boundaries' but whether students can convert the knowledge demanded by the new specification into marks consistently across all four skills.


For German specifically, the new qualification also makes it risky to use the old 1GN0 papers as if they were direct predictions of the new exam. They remain useful for language practice, but the assessment demands and content should be prioritised from the new 1GN1 materials.


French

French has exactly the same Foundation boundaries as German and Spanish. At Higher, French sits between German and Spanish, although the differences are very small. The 2026 figures do not support a simplistic claim that French is automatically easier or harder than German.


Spanish

Spanish has the highest Higher boundaries of the three languages at every grade, but the differences are modest. The most visible gap is at grade 9, where Spanish requires 179/200 (89.5%), compared with 175/200 (87.5%) for German and French. This is a useful observation for teachers, but not evidence on its own of a difference in student attainment or teaching quality.


6. The Foundation/Higher issue

The 2026 boundaries reinforce a point that is often lost when departments discuss 'percentage needed for a 4'. Foundation and Higher are different routes through the qualification. Foundation caps the available grades at 5, while Higher provides access to grades 9–4. Consequently, tiering decisions need to be based on a realistic assessment of a student's likely mark profile, not on the hope that a student will simply scrape a Higher grade.

Table

2026

Foundation

Higher

Top available grade

5

9

Grade 4 boundary

70.5%* (German 70%)

German 50% / French 53.5% / Spanish 54%

Grade 5 boundary

76.0%

German 57.5% / French 60.0% / Spanish 61.0%

The apparent overlap in the table is intentional: on Foundation, grade 5 is the highest grade. On Higher, grade 5 is below grade 4 in the grade sequence. Departments should therefore avoid using a single generic 'percentage target' when advising students about tier entry.


7. What we can and cannot say about individual papers

Pearson publishes notional component boundaries for individual papers. These are useful for mock analysis and diagnostic work, but they are not separate grades awarded to candidates. The official grade is determined from the total subject mark.


There is also a timing issue for this report. Pearson's 2026 results support information states that GCSE examiner reports are scheduled for 25 August 2026.


Once the examiner reports are released, the most useful second-stage analysis will be: Listening → Speaking → Reading → Writing; then item-level strengths and weaknesses; then comparison of the new specification with the first-year expectations communicated by Pearson.


8. What this means for teaching in 2026–27

NOTE: This is my personal view and interpretation for my future planning, it certainly is no prescriptive!


  • Stop teaching to an old raw-mark model. The 2025 280-mark boundaries are useful historical evidence, but they should not be used to set 2026/27 mock thresholds for the new qualification.

  • Use the new 200-mark qualification as the baseline. Departmental tracking, mock analysis and intervention should be built around 1GN1/1FR1/1SP1.

  • Track skills, not just total marks. A student can have a comfortable overall mark while having a serious weakness in one skill. The four-skill structure makes this particularly important.

  • Prioritise controlled language production. Students need reliable control of high-frequency verbs, tense formation, word order, agreement and core structures. Longer answers are not automatically better answers.

  • Make Foundation teaching ambitious but accurate. The grade 5 boundary is 76% in all three languages in 2026. Students need secure, accurate performance across the paper rather than a small collection of impressive phrases.

  • For Higher, protect the grades 4–6 corridor. The 2026 Higher grade 4 boundaries sit around 50–54%, depending on language. This makes accuracy, comprehension and completion extremely important for students aiming for secure passes and mid-tier grades.

  • Use ResultsPlus and scripts. Pearson states that ResultsPlus provides detailed question-level analysis and that access to scripts can support post-results review. This is where a department can move from speculation to evidence.


9. Interpretation

The most defensible story from the 2026 Edexcel MFL boundaries is not that one language has suddenly become easy or difficult. It is that all three languages have entered a new assessment cycle, and the first set of boundaries is remarkably close across the subjects. Foundation is identical across German, French and Spanish, while Higher differs only modestly. That makes the quality of teaching, curriculum sequencing and students' ability to control language much more interesting than the headline boundary numbers.


For German teachers in particular, I would resist the temptation to interpret the 2026 boundary as either a 'German problem' or a 'German advantage'. The useful question is different: What did students actually do on the new papers, and where did marks disappear? That answer should come from Pearson's examiner reports, ResultsPlus and candidate scripts rather than from grade boundaries alone.


10. Key figures at a glance

Table

Language

Foundation 5

Foundation 4

Higher 9

Higher 7

Higher 4

German

152/200 (76.0%)

140/200 (70%)

175/200 (87.5%)

146/200 (73.0%)

100/200 (50.0%)

French

152/200 (76.0%)

141/200 (70.5%)

175/200 (87.5%)

147/200 (73.5%)

107/200 (53.5%)

Spanish

152/200 (76.0%)

141/200 (70.5%)

179/200 (89.5%)

152/200 (76.0%)

108/200 (54.0%)

Higher Tier

Grade

French

German

Spanish

9

88% (175/200)

88% (175/200)

90% (179/200)

8

80% (161/200)

80% (160/200)

82% (165/200)

7

74% (147/200)

73% (146/200)

76% (152/200)

6

66% (133/200)

65% (130/200)

68% (137/200)

5

60% (120/200)

57% (115/200)

61% (122/200)

4

54% (107/200)

50% (100/200)

54% (108/200)

3

50% (100/200)

46% (92/200)

50% (101/200)

In 2026, Spanish has the highest boundary at every Higher grade shown. German is slightly below French at grades 8–3, while French and German are identical at Grade 9 (87.5%, rounded to 88%).

At Grade 7, for example, the 2026 boundaries are approximately 73.5% for French, 73.0% for German and 76.0% for Spanish. At Grade 5 they are 60.0%, 57.5% and 61.0% respectively.

Foundation Tier

Grade

French

German

Spanish

5

76% (152/200)

76% (152/200)

76% (152/200)

4

70.5% (141/200)

70% (140/200)

70.5% (141/200)

3

50% (100/200)

50% (100/200)

50% (100/200)

2

30% (60/200)

30% (60/200)

30% (60/200)

1

10% (20/200)

10% (20/200)

10% (20/200)

The 2026 Foundation boundaries are effectively identical for French and German and identical for all three languages at Grades 5, 3, 2 and 1. Spanish differs only at Grade 4, where its boundary is 70.5% compared with 70.0% for German and 70.5% for French.


This means there is very little evidence from the 2026 Foundation overall boundaries of a meaningful difference between French, German and Spanish.

Useful departmental reference points

Tier / Grade

French

German

Spanish

Higher 9

88%

88%

90%

Higher 7

74%

73%

76%

Higher 5

60%

58%

61%

Higher 4

54%

50%

54%

Foundation 5

76%

76%

76%

Foundation 4

71%

70%

71%


Download the document here


Sources and notes

  1. Pearson Edexcel, Grade Boundaries – June 2026 – GCSE (9–1), published 20 August 2026.

  2. Pearson Edexcel, Grade Boundaries – June 2025 – GCSE (9–1).

  3. Pearson Edexcel, Grade Boundaries FAQ: New Pearson Edexcel French, German and Spanish GCSEs.

  4. Pearson Edexcel, Getting Ready for Results 2026 – Languages, including timetable for examiner reports and ResultsPlus.

  5. Pearson Edexcel, GCSE German (2024) qualification page – first teaching 2024, first assessment 2026.

  6. Joint Council for Qualifications, Exam Results / Exam Results Data.

  7. British Academy, GCSE Results Day 2026 and GCSE Results Day 2025 language-entry analysis.


Source links:

 

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page